Login or register with Wargaming Account

stronk interwebz stuff

Post things that don't have to remain secret here.
Access: Registered users (read&post) and guests (read only).

Moderators: Officer, Commander

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Dr_Slartibartfart » 10 Jan 2017 23:36

Image
  • 5

Bois
Spoiler:
I'm still here

Image
User avatar
Dr_Slartibartfart

Member
Member
 
Posts: 2384
Location: Yes
Reputation: 1089

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Kriegerseele » 11 Jan 2017 20:02

Image
  • -1

With great power comes great responsibility
User avatar
Kriegerseele

Member
Member
 
Posts: 1689
Location: Plebavarian
Reputation: 700

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby loxx_ » 11 Jan 2017 20:09

Image
  • 0

User avatar
loxx_

Member
Member
 
Posts: 277
Reputation: 556

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Kriegerseele » 11 Jan 2017 20:12

loxx_ wrote:Image

anlauf statt gleitgel Kappa
  • 0

With great power comes great responsibility
User avatar
Kriegerseele

Member
Member
 
Posts: 1689
Location: Plebavarian
Reputation: 700

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Orrie » 11 Jan 2017 20:38

loxx_ wrote:Image


sweden.gif
  • 8

User avatar
Orrie

Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 2223
Reputation: 1948

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Bronn1 » 12 Jan 2017 16:14

  • 1

Bronn1

Member
Member
 
Posts: 737
Reputation: 402

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Thoryk » 12 Jan 2017 16:39



Skin color aside, she doesn't even look good :smug:
  • 2

Thoryk
IDEAL Propaganda Minister
User avatar
Thoryk

Officer
Officer
 
Posts: 2163
Location: In Ralfs lair, serving my master.
Reputation: 1976

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Xen » 12 Jan 2017 19:00

Looks like shit man wtf. I mena i would still disagree with the choice even if she were prettier, but this is just outright insulting
  • 0

User avatar
Xen

Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 6505
Reputation: 3348

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Xen » 12 Jan 2017 19:34

Image
  • 1

User avatar
Xen

Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 6505
Reputation: 3348

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Marliini » 12 Jan 2017 19:36

Xen wrote:Looks like shit man wtf. I mena i would still disagree with the choice even if she were prettier, but this is just outright insulting


I know. I have no idea who is in the damn jury but they need to have they eyesight fixed. Last year was sort of the same. They picked someone not very pretty. People complained. Someone from the jury defended the winner with 'she has a beautiful figure'. Of course I am not an expert in modelling like the members of the jury are but maybe the winner should also have a face that you can look at more than two seconds in addition to having a beautiful figure. Not just the figure with an ugly mug...

EDIT: I was talking about 2015. Here's the winner from that year http://www.iltasanomat.fi/viihde/art-2000000860642.html
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Marliini

Officer
Officer
 
Posts: 1463
Location: Finnland
Reputation: 627

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Gyre » 12 Jan 2017 19:43

Marliini wrote:EDIT: I was talking about 2015. Here's the winner from that year http://www.iltasanomat.fi/viihde/art-2000000860642.html

Shit thats a proper butter face.
  • 0

User avatar
Gyre

Ex-mr sexii
Ex-mr sexii
 
Posts: 626
Reputation: 418

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Swoopie » 12 Jan 2017 20:03

Marliini wrote:
Xen wrote:Looks like shit man wtf. I mena i would still disagree with the choice even if she were prettier, but this is just outright insulting


I know. I have no idea who is in the damn jury but they need to have they eyesight fixed. Last year was sort of the same. They picked someone not very pretty. People complained. Someone from the jury defended the winner with 'she has a beautiful figure'. Of course I am not an expert in modelling like the members of the jury are but maybe the winner should also have a face that you can look at more than two seconds in addition to having a beautiful figure. Not just the figure with an ugly mug...

EDIT: I was talking about 2015. Here's the winner from that year http://www.iltasanomat.fi/viihde/art-2000000860642.html

Hell maybe I should run for one of these. Could actually win if the jury is like this. What the fuck am I even looking at?!?
  • 1

Image
User avatar
Swoopie

Ex-mr sexii
Ex-mr sexii
 
Posts: 1851
Location: Suomifinlandperkele
Reputation: 1632

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Xen » 12 Jan 2017 20:13

Marliini wrote:
Xen wrote:Looks like shit man wtf. I mena i would still disagree with the choice even if she were prettier, but this is just outright insulting


I know. I have no idea who is in the damn jury but they need to have they eyesight fixed. Last year was sort of the same. They picked someone not very pretty. People complained. Someone from the jury defended the winner with 'she has a beautiful figure'. Of course I am not an expert in modelling like the members of the jury are but maybe the winner should also have a face that you can look at more than two seconds in addition to having a beautiful figure. Not just the figure with an ugly mug...

EDIT: I was talking about 2015. Here's the winner from that year http://www.iltasanomat.fi/viihde/art-2000000860642.html


wtf is that a tranny?
  • 0

User avatar
Xen

Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 6505
Reputation: 3348

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby loxx_ » 12 Jan 2017 20:14

Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?
  • 1

User avatar
loxx_

Member
Member
 
Posts: 277
Reputation: 556

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Orrie » 12 Jan 2017 20:31

loxx_ wrote:Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?


Maybe that's the problem, that they are? Hmmm
  • 0

User avatar
Orrie

Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 2223
Reputation: 1948

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Marliini » 12 Jan 2017 21:41

Orrie wrote:
loxx_ wrote:Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?


Maybe that's the problem, that they are? Hmmm

Would you find 2015 or 2017 attractive sober? They must have been completely wasted or voted them as a joke.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Marliini

Officer
Officer
 
Posts: 1463
Location: Finnland
Reputation: 627

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Randomhero_ » 12 Jan 2017 22:26

Marliini wrote:
Orrie wrote:
loxx_ wrote:Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?


Maybe that's the problem, that they are? Hmmm

Would you find 2015 or 2017 attractive sober? They must have been completely wasted or voted them as a joke.


Happy b-day! <3
  • 0

User avatar
Randomhero_

Ex-mr sexii
Ex-mr sexii
 
Posts: 208
Reputation: 227

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Orrie » 12 Jan 2017 23:09

Marliini wrote:
Orrie wrote:
loxx_ wrote:Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?


Maybe that's the problem, that they are? Hmmm

Would you find 2015 or 2017 attractive sober? They must have been completely wasted or voted them as a joke.


... The joke was that normal Finnish people are drunk all the time....
  • 0

User avatar
Orrie

Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 2223
Reputation: 1948

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Xen » 12 Jan 2017 23:47

This guy took his girlfriend's tinder account and trolled a bit.

Image
  • 3

User avatar
Xen

Commander
Commander
 
Posts: 6505
Reputation: 3348

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

Postby Kriegerseele » 13 Jan 2017 04:32

we need smth like this for IDEAL >:D http://www.wsly.nl/S3AL/
  • 2

With great power comes great responsibility
User avatar
Kriegerseele

Member
Member
 
Posts: 1689
Location: Plebavarian
Reputation: 700

PreviousNext

Return to Public Friends' Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


Reputation System ©'