Page 10 of 32

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 05 Oct 2014 16:08
by Bwargh
Aa_Melon wrote:why sell a t10?
Btw T57 heavy is still awesome

I agree that selling a t10, and even more the T57 which is not garbage, is kinda meh. But T57 is rubbish compared to 50B now imo.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 05 Oct 2014 16:43
by Swoopie
Aa_Melon wrote:
Swoopie wrote:
Sekundenkleber wrote:Sorry if this has been discussed already, but will the KV-1S still be used for competitive T6 stuff?

EDIT: by KV-1S i mean the new KV-85

Haven't tried it myself but heard that the gun control on the 100mm is much better than on the old 122mm. So based on that I'd say they're still useful alongside Cromwells and some other stuff.

And I'll probably sell the T57, and get the E5 back. Been wanting a tank which can actually brawl, and now I have a chance to get one.


why sell a t10?
Btw T57 heavy is still awesome

1. Bought it while it was -30% so the overall credit loss is about 1m
2. If I get E5 I need a crew for it (Original E5 crew is in the T32).
3. Because of point 2. the T57 would sit in the garage collecting dust.
4. As you know I'm in the military and don't have that much time to grind credits, so selling is the easier option.
5. And also because my time is limited, I want to enjoy the game. Right now I haven't enjoyed T57 much while the E5 is very tempting to get (And I did like it a lot back in the days).

Will test the T57 today night and make the final judgement.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 05 Oct 2014 21:54
by Kolbur
Swoopie wrote:
Sekundenkleber wrote:Sorry if this has been discussed already, but will the KV-1S still be used for competitive T6 stuff?

EDIT: by KV-1S i mean the new KV-85

Haven't tried it myself but heard that the gun control on the 100mm is much better than on the old 122mm. So based on that I'd say they're still useful alongside Cromwells and some other stuff.

And I'll probably sell the T57, and get the E5 back. Been wanting a tank which can actually brawl, and now I have a chance to get one.

I only tried KV-85 once but I don't see why the 122mm shouldn't be used. The gun control is a bit shittier but it was already shitty before and it didn't matter because of stronk soviet akkuracy! Dat alpha and pen is still there too... I don't see a replacement for KV-85 (and the 100mm is still an alternative if heavies have to snipe more).

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 17 Oct 2014 13:30
by Bowser_nl
To answer Hellfish' question from a few days back. This is where you pen the Löwe with the T49 HE shells.

Image

In game it says the Löwe has 100 mm side armor, but the marked area is 80mm and the rest is 115mm effective.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 17 Oct 2014 18:14
by Daedal__
Bowser_nl wrote:To answer Hellfish' question from a few days back. This is where you pen the Löwe with the T49 HE shells.

Spoiler:
Image


In game it says the Löwe has 100 mm side armor, but the marked area is 80mm and the rest is 115mm effective.


I usually try to go for turret sides, as if you are too far it would be very hard to hit such a small spot (then again I have pened T110e5s and T34s in side hull just above tracks several times) and when at close range for the most part you will not be allowed to stay and aim down fully.

But maybe you are right, should try, as the turret sides are often enough not penetrated.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 17 Oct 2014 22:10
by Bowser_nl
Daedal wrote:
Bowser_nl wrote:To answer Hellfish' question from a few days back. This is where you pen the Löwe with the T49 HE shells.

Spoiler:
Image


In game it says the Löwe has 100 mm side armor, but the marked area is 80mm and the rest is 115mm effective.


I usually try to go for turret sides, as if you are too far it would be very hard to hit such a small spot (then again I have pened T110e5s and T34s in side hull just above tracks several times) and when at close range for the most part you will not be allowed to stay and aim down fully.

But maybe you are right, should try, as the turret sides are often enough not penetrated.


I was right next to him, turret has 90 something armour

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 17 Oct 2014 22:44
by RedlineRailgunningRemmel
How is the T-54 Lightweight baby tank?

RU 251 so far is amazing, haven't bought the T49 yet since im not sure if its a rage rng tank.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 17 Oct 2014 23:01
by Bowser_nl
Remmke wrote:How is the T-54 Lightweight baby tank?

RU 251 so far is amazing, haven't bought the T49 yet since im not sure if its a rage rng tank.


It's meh. Only thing that makes it special is its armor. You can bounce 248 pen AP on your turret quite frequently. It's just a Wz132 with 100mm and armor.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 17 Oct 2014 23:02
by H311fi5h
T-54 ltwt camo is still bugged, so you will have to wait for patch 9.4 to properly asses it.
According to ftr it is on 30% discount next month, so you might want to wait if you haven't bought it yet.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 17 Oct 2014 23:59
by wetlioN
not rly as stronk as ru. still my highest avg xp tenk

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014 10:44
by Thoryk
In the new ranzar video.

Image

It's so fitting :D

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014 13:06
by H311fi5h
I lol'd so hard when I watched it. It's perfect. Best ranzar in a long time.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 04 Nov 2014 16:01
by Sekundenkleber
I tried the Bulldog with autoloader today. To all the people who said the non-autoloader is better since the tank came out: TO HELL WITH YOU!!!!

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 04 Nov 2014 16:10
by H311fi5h
I tried both guns and got exactly the same average damage. For random both guns are perfectly viable.

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 04 Nov 2014 16:18
by wetlioN
Sekundenkleber wrote:I tried the Bulldog with autoloader today. To all the people who said the non-autoloader is better since the tank came out: TO HELL WITH YOU!!!!

its not like im totally religiously discussing this everywhere already :angryseal: y people no listen :|

autoloader is luv autoloader is LYF!

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 04 Nov 2014 21:32
by burnzilla
Thoryk wrote:In the new ranzar video.

Image

It's so fitting :D



i don't get it :tomatard:

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 04 Nov 2014 21:33
by Bowser_nl
burnzilla wrote:
Thoryk wrote:In the new ranzar video.

Image

It's so fitting :D



i don't get it :tomatard:


Whats not to get? It's a drawn T49. :P

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 04 Nov 2014 21:42
by burnzilla
yeah i see that, but what's funny about it or anything ? never even had to smile when watching these comics :|

drawingskillz of our sealdesigner are like 10 times higher and sealemotes are waaaaaay funnier

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 04 Nov 2014 21:46
by AaMelon
That smile perfectly describes me when I am playing with the 152mm shooting bchat 25t's ass

Re: tank discussion

PostPosted: 04 Nov 2014 21:47
by H311fi5h
It's not about the detail of drawing or the storytelling, but the fact that ranzar is somehow able to make those tanks feel alive, to make them human, everyone with his own charakter and personality. I think this is amazing.