Page 252 of 336

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 10 Jan 2017 23:36
by Dr_Slartibartfart
Image

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 11 Jan 2017 20:02
by Kriegerseele
Image

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 11 Jan 2017 20:09
by loxx_
Image

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 11 Jan 2017 20:12
by Kriegerseele
loxx_ wrote:Image

anlauf statt gleitgel Kappa

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 11 Jan 2017 20:38
by Orrie
loxx_ wrote:Image


sweden.gif

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 16:14
by Bronn1

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 16:39
by Thoryk


Skin color aside, she doesn't even look good :smug:

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 19:00
by Xen
Looks like shit man wtf. I mena i would still disagree with the choice even if she were prettier, but this is just outright insulting

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 19:34
by Xen
Image

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 19:36
by Marliini
Xen wrote:Looks like shit man wtf. I mena i would still disagree with the choice even if she were prettier, but this is just outright insulting


I know. I have no idea who is in the damn jury but they need to have they eyesight fixed. Last year was sort of the same. They picked someone not very pretty. People complained. Someone from the jury defended the winner with 'she has a beautiful figure'. Of course I am not an expert in modelling like the members of the jury are but maybe the winner should also have a face that you can look at more than two seconds in addition to having a beautiful figure. Not just the figure with an ugly mug...

EDIT: I was talking about 2015. Here's the winner from that year http://www.iltasanomat.fi/viihde/art-2000000860642.html

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 19:43
by Gyre
Marliini wrote:EDIT: I was talking about 2015. Here's the winner from that year http://www.iltasanomat.fi/viihde/art-2000000860642.html

Shit thats a proper butter face.

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 20:03
by Swoopie
Marliini wrote:
Xen wrote:Looks like shit man wtf. I mena i would still disagree with the choice even if she were prettier, but this is just outright insulting


I know. I have no idea who is in the damn jury but they need to have they eyesight fixed. Last year was sort of the same. They picked someone not very pretty. People complained. Someone from the jury defended the winner with 'she has a beautiful figure'. Of course I am not an expert in modelling like the members of the jury are but maybe the winner should also have a face that you can look at more than two seconds in addition to having a beautiful figure. Not just the figure with an ugly mug...

EDIT: I was talking about 2015. Here's the winner from that year http://www.iltasanomat.fi/viihde/art-2000000860642.html

Hell maybe I should run for one of these. Could actually win if the jury is like this. What the fuck am I even looking at?!?

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 20:13
by Xen
Marliini wrote:
Xen wrote:Looks like shit man wtf. I mena i would still disagree with the choice even if she were prettier, but this is just outright insulting


I know. I have no idea who is in the damn jury but they need to have they eyesight fixed. Last year was sort of the same. They picked someone not very pretty. People complained. Someone from the jury defended the winner with 'she has a beautiful figure'. Of course I am not an expert in modelling like the members of the jury are but maybe the winner should also have a face that you can look at more than two seconds in addition to having a beautiful figure. Not just the figure with an ugly mug...

EDIT: I was talking about 2015. Here's the winner from that year http://www.iltasanomat.fi/viihde/art-2000000860642.html


wtf is that a tranny?

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 20:14
by loxx_
Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 20:31
by Orrie
loxx_ wrote:Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?


Maybe that's the problem, that they are? Hmmm

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 21:41
by Marliini
Orrie wrote:
loxx_ wrote:Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?


Maybe that's the problem, that they are? Hmmm

Would you find 2015 or 2017 attractive sober? They must have been completely wasted or voted them as a joke.

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 22:26
by Randomhero_
Marliini wrote:
Orrie wrote:
loxx_ wrote:Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?


Maybe that's the problem, that they are? Hmmm

Would you find 2015 or 2017 attractive sober? They must have been completely wasted or voted them as a joke.


Happy b-day! <3

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 23:09
by Orrie
Marliini wrote:
Orrie wrote:
loxx_ wrote:Probably sounds like an impossible plan for Finns, but maybe the jury should be sober when picking a winner?


Maybe that's the problem, that they are? Hmmm

Would you find 2015 or 2017 attractive sober? They must have been completely wasted or voted them as a joke.


... The joke was that normal Finnish people are drunk all the time....

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 12 Jan 2017 23:47
by Xen
This guy took his girlfriend's tinder account and trolled a bit.

Image

Re: stronk interwebz stuff

PostPosted: 13 Jan 2017 04:32
by Kriegerseele
we need smth like this for IDEAL >:D http://www.wsly.nl/S3AL/